Submission
Guidelines
General Guidelines
Submissions are considered on the conditions
that they are original material, have not been published
elsewhere, and are not under review by another publication.
Submissions will be acknowledged via e-mail.
Types of Submissions
The topics of individual issues will determine to
some extent the type of submissions considered. In general,
however, submissions should be of interest to a broad
academic community. They should also be accessible and
easily readable. This means the use of reader-focused design:
e.g., minimum use of acronyms, accurate use of headings
and subheadings, and explanation of terms.
All submissions will be judged according to their purpose.
Submissions may take the form of:
Research papers
Must be meaningful to researchers and should serve
the scholarly community’s need to learn from
the recorded body of knowledge. Need to indicate
clearly scope and limitations, describe the design
and methodology, and present the results. Typically
they state a problem or describe an issue to be
examined, review the literature, describe research
methodology, give results of the study, and indicate
implications for future research.
Literature reviews
Main purpose is to examine the research literature
in a particular subject area with reference to a
specific problem or issue and for some disciplines within a well-defined
time frame (e.g., 1975-2003). The issue should be considered in
terms of future research, or theory and application. Relationship
of issue to relevant literature must be clearly demonstrated.
Position papers
Identify and describe a problem or an issue, and
should provide a cogent argument based on a review of current literature,
applicable theory, and logical critical analysis of the issue.
Evaluations
Present a formal evaluation of a course and/or program.
Describe the evaluation model and/or approach used.
Although a general literature review is not necessary,
literature on program evaluation should be used
to support the choice of model/approach. Should
describe context, evaluation design, and outcomes.
Case studies / Ethnographic reports
Describe a problem or issue within a particular
context, using contrast, comparison, research literature and/or
applicable theory, and summarize with a discussion of outcomes
and the conclusion drawn. Offer directions for future research
and/or application.
Field reports
Define a problem, need or opportunity and give a general orientation,
a description of the research process to date, an initial evaluation
with key factors that will influence recommendations or final conclusions,
and if possible provide suggestions for future research or for
application of findings.
Creative non-fiction reflections
Seek to deal with underlying issues and themes in
reporting on individual experience on the related
issue. Should give context/background, issues for
discussion, describe experience and relation to
the field under discussion, draw conclusions and
provide suggestions.
The Review Process
Research papers received by the Guest Editor for each
issue will be submitted to a double-blind peer review
process. Other types of submissions (e.g., case studies)
may be reviewed by the issue Guest Editor and one other
expert in the field.
Submissions will be evaluated in terms of suitability,
contribution, and interest. Individual issues may have
additional evaluation criteria. Generally reviewers will
consider:
• Significance of the problem/issue
• Applicability and interest
• Complete, clear and well organized presentation
• Accurate and useful interpretation
• Sound argument and analysis
• Interest to a general academic audience
The Editorial Process
Authors will receive reviewers’ comments and changes.
Prior to the release date, authors will have a specified
period to request minor corrections or changes. Before
the release date, authors will be able to review and authorize
the final editorial changes.
Once a manuscript is accepted and authors have made the
recommended changes on their submissions, UFV Research
Review will copyedit the manuscript to correct errors
and to ensure conformation to UFV Research Review
publication standards.
Once the issue has been released, only critical corrections
or changes will be made to the file upon agreement between
the author(s) and UFV Research Review. These
changes will be noted and dated at the end of the file.
Format and Structure
Length of manuscripts will vary according to the Call for Papers for each issue. In general, however, submissions should be 4000–6500 words. Pages should be numbered in the upper right corner beginning with the title page as number one.
Title Page
• the title of the paper should be no longer than 40 words
• full names of the authors as well as their position and institutional affiliations, mailing addresses, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail addresses. In the case of multiple authors, please indicate which author is to receive correspondence and proofs.
• total word count
• type of submission
Blind Title Page
Gives only the title of the manuscript.
Abstract Page (with Key Terms)
On a separate page following the blind title page. A concise paragraph summary of not more than 200 words that gives the main points of the submission (e.g., what was done, what was found and what was concluded). Abstracts should be clear, descriptive and include all important key terms from the paper.
Key terms: 6–8 terms indicating the subjects and topics of the manuscript. If country is of particular importance, indicate so in one of the terms (e.g., online education in Australia).
Text Organization
The title should appear on the first page of the text. However, no reference to author(s) should appear there or elsewhere in the manuscript.
Organization will vary according to type of manuscript. Information on format and use of headings is found in the Style Guide. Guidelines for organization of the most typical submissions are given below:
- Research papers: Problem or issue to be examined, literature review, research methodology, results of the study, and implications for future research.
- Literature reviews: Problem or issue to be examined, review of literature, indications/implications for future research or comparison of theory to applications.
- Position papers: Problem or issue, review of theory or literature, analysis, solution or direction.
- Evaluations: Context of evaluation, evaluation design (including program evaluation literature review to support choice), and outcomes.
- Case studies: Problem or issue, setting or event, theory and/or the research literature, approach taken, results, and implications.
- Field reports: Problem or opportunity identified (context provided); design, development, and initial evaluation of the process and/or product; lessons learned and applications.
- Creative non-fiction reflections: Context/background, issues for discussion, experience and relation to the field under discussion, conclusions and suggestions (applications).
Acknowledgments
Indicate financial support or persons who have made significant contributions to the work.
Notes
Notes should always be used for citing Web sites. They should be identified in the text by consecutive numbers enclosed in brackets [ ] and listed at the end of the text. Please then provide full Web site addresses in the end list. Otherwise, Notes should be used only if absolutely necessary.
References
All entries appearing in the Reference section must be referred to in the text and all in-text citations must appear in the References section. References are to use APA style. For more information on style and format see Documentation below.
Appendices
May be used to provide more extensive data.
Style
Guide
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Abbreviations and acronyms should be explained when first
used, e.g., the University of the Fraser Valley
(UFV). In subsequent references, abbreviate the name
of an organization or agency to the initial letters, use
capitals and no periods.
Equations
Equations should be centred on the page, with a blank
line above and below. They should be numbered consecutively
through the paper, using Arabic numbers in parentheses
at the right-hand margin.
Figures, Charts and Diagrams
Figures, charts and diagrams must be numbered consecutively
using Arabic numerals and placed in their respective positions
within the text. All graphics must be referred at the
appropriate points in the text and their main
point or function must be indicated.
Figures, charts, and diagrams require titles placed above
the illustration. Where appropriate, sources of data are
to be indicated in parentheses below the figure.
Headings
Headings and subheadings break up large blocks of text.
Major headings and subheadings should be followed by introductory
paragraphs (i.e., headings should not come one after another
without text in between).
First-degree:
Centred, bold. Main words capitalized.
Description of the Study
The purpose of the study reported in this paper
was to identify literacy practices associated with
computer gameplay and to determine if different
literacy practices…
|
Second-degree:
Left-hand margin, bold. Main words capitalized.
Definitions
Two of the key terms used in describing the project
require definition. The first term is…
Targets and Specifications
The targets and specifications of the project
focused on three key areas: equipment and software,
training teachers in techniques of distance education,
and continuous encouragement and motivation for
the use of ICT applications.
|
Third-degree:
Left-hand margin, bold, followed by period (.) Text follows
immediately. Only first word capitalized.
Equipment and software. Equipment for
each school consisted of a system of one or more
computers, a printer, a video camera, educational
software and supporting software. The number of
computers…
Continuous encouragement and motivation
for the use of ICT applications. Ongoing
encouragement and motivation for the use of ICT
applications was an area identified as crucial
by a significant number of respondents (87%)
|
Italics
Use italics sparingly to identify special terms or to
indicate special emphasis.
Documentation
For paper submissions to other Research Review issues documentation is to follow the guidelines of the Publication
Manual of the American Psychological Association 5th Edition,
2001.
In-text Citations
In-text citations are to use the author-date style of
APA. Citations for direct quotations must provide page
numbers as well.
Reference List
References are to be in alphabetical order by author, in hanging indent
style, and include complete information: author(s), date, page numbers
for articles or a section of a book, complete names
for institutions and organizations rather than abbreviations
or acronyms.
Authors are responsible for accuracy of all references.
This is especially important in terms of electronic sources
as inaccuracy can lead to a dead link.
APA Guidelines Web Sites
A number of APA guidelines are available electronically.
See, for example,
http://www.lib.usm.edu/~instruct/guides/apa.html
http://www.crk.umn.edu/library/links/apa5th.htm
http://webster.commnet.edu/apa/apa_index.htm
http://www.apastyle.org/
http://www.vanguard.edu/faculty/ddegelman
Copyright
In accepting the offer by UFV Research Review
to publish the manuscript authors agree to assign to UFV
Research Review the rights to publish, distribute,
archive, and retrieve this material.
Authors are required to complete the Authors’ Consent
Form (html | pdf).
Permission
and Acknowledgment
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to quote
copyrighted material and for clearing any rights prior
to submitting materials. Authors submitting manuscripts
for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement
of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher
against any breach of such warranty.
Commercial use of any portion of this electronic
journal is prohibited.
[Back] to the UFV Research Review
|